Landlord anti-discrimination rules 2026: new law
Corrected the penalties: the maximum is £7,000 per penalty, with no £40,000 tier, and clarified how older insurance policies are treated.
Since 1 May 2026, the Renters' Rights Act 2025 makes it unlawful to refuse a tenant, or treat them less favourably, because they have children or receive benefits. Councils can fine you up to £7,000 for a breach.
What the law now says
Since 1 May 2026, it is unlawful for landlords and letting agents to discriminate against prospective or existing tenants because they have children or receive housing-related benefits (including Universal Credit, Housing Benefit, or Local Housing Allowance).
This goes beyond the existing Equality Act protections. Previously, “no DSS” or “no children” policies were frowned upon and had been challenged in court, but there was no specific statutory prohibition until this Act.
What counts as discrimination
The Act prohibits discrimination at every stage of the lettings process:
- Advertising: You cannot state “no children”, “no DSS”, “no benefits”, “professionals only” (where this is code for excluding families), or similar in property listings
- Viewings: You cannot refuse to allow viewings based on whether the prospective tenant has children or receives benefits
- Withholding information: You cannot provide less information to applicants because of their family status or income source
- Refusing a tenancy: You cannot refuse to grant a tenancy on these grounds
- Terms of tenancy: You cannot offer less favourable terms because of children or benefits
What you can still do
The anti-discrimination rules do not prevent legitimate tenant assessment. You can still:
- Assess affordability: You can evaluate whether a tenant can afford the rent, regardless of income source. A tenant on benefits whose income covers the rent should be assessed the same as any other tenant.
- Request references: You can ask for landlord references, employment references (where applicable), and credit checks for all applicants equally.
- Consider property suitability: If a property is genuinely unsuitable (e.g. a one-bedroom flat for a family of five), you can raise this, provided the concern is based on overcrowding regulations.
- Apply consistent criteria: You can set objective criteria (minimum income-to-rent ratio, satisfactory credit check, positive references) as long as they apply equally to all applicants.
Common scenarios
A tenant on Universal Credit applies for your property. You must assess them on the same basis as any other applicant. If their UC payments plus any other income meet your affordability criteria, you cannot refuse them solely because they receive benefits.
A family with three children wants to rent your two-bedroom flat. You can consider whether the property meets occupancy standards under overcrowding regulations. A blanket “no children” policy is unlawful, and a family of two adults and one child in a two-bedroom flat is perfectly standard.
Your mortgage lender has a “no DSS” clause. Some older buy-to-let mortgages include restrictions on benefit-receiving tenants. These clauses are increasingly being removed by lenders, and they do not override the law. You are still legally obligated not to discriminate. If your mortgage terms create a conflict, discuss this with your lender.
Your insurance policy excludes benefit tenants. A term like this has no effect in a policy taken out or renewed since 1 May 2026. There is a narrow exception while an older policy with such a term is still running: you can act to avoid breaching it. That ends when the policy is renewed. Check with your provider.
Penalties
Councils can impose a civil penalty of up to £7,000 for a breach. They can impose a further penalty, also capped at £7,000, if the conduct carries on more than 28 days after the first penalty, or if you were penalised for the same kind of breach in the previous five years. There is no £40,000 tier and no criminal offence. The Act doesn't give tenants their own compensation claim for these breaches, though the Equality Act still applies separately.
Letting agents are subject to the same rules. If your agent discriminates on your behalf, both you and the agent may face penalties.
What to do now
- Review your advertising: Remove any language that could be interpreted as excluding families or benefit recipients
- Update your criteria: Ensure your tenant selection criteria are objective, applied equally, and don't indirectly discriminate
- Brief your agents: If you use a letting agent, confirm they understand the new rules and have updated their processes
- Check your mortgage and insurance: Contact your lender and insurer to update any restrictive clauses
- Document your decisions: Keep records of why you accepted or rejected applicants, based on objective criteria. This protects you against claims of discrimination.
Frequently asked questions
Can I still refuse a tenant who is on benefits?
Since 1 May 2026 it is unlawful to discriminate against tenants because they receive housing-related benefits such as Universal Credit, Housing Benefit or Local Housing Allowance. You can still assess affordability, but a tenant on benefits whose income covers the rent must be assessed on the same basis as any other applicant and can’t be refused solely because they receive benefits.
Can I advertise a property as “no children” or “no DSS”?
No. The Renters’ Rights Act 2025 prohibits discrimination at every stage of the lettings process, including advertising. You cannot state “no children”, “no DSS”, “no benefits”, or “professionals only” where it’s code for excluding families. You also can’t refuse viewings, withhold information, refuse a tenancy, or offer less favourable terms on these grounds.
What can I still do when assessing tenants?
The rules don’t prevent legitimate tenant assessment. You can evaluate affordability regardless of income source, request landlord references, employment references and credit checks for all applicants equally, and apply consistent objective criteria such as a minimum income-to-rent ratio. You can also consider whether the property is genuinely suitable, as long as you judge that against overcrowding regulations.
What are the penalties for discriminating against tenants?
Councils can impose a civil penalty of up to £7,000. They can impose a further penalty, also up to £7,000, if the conduct carries on more than 28 days after the first one, or for a repeat breach within five years. There is no £40,000 tier and no criminal offence. Letting agents are subject to the same rules, so if your agent discriminates on your behalf, both you and the agent may face penalties.
Written by Antoine Helsen
Founder of HouseFile and a UK landlord managing his own rental portfolio. He writes about landlord compliance from first-hand experience, reviewed against UK legislation and official gov.uk guidance. More about HouseFile.
Keep your property paperwork in one place
14 days free · no card needed
